How to get sharp photos using the hyperfocal point

I drive by this Munkholmbroen several times a week. It's a great location for spotting sunrises, and the tide does, that there a ever changing small seascapes. One morning I found this little crescent island in the water. Photo by: Jacob Surland, www.caughtinpixels.com

Do you know the feeling? You think you nailed the composition, and the light was just perfect, and the clouds were gorgeous. You’re convinced you have just got a great shot. You hurry home to unload the memory card, but when you see the photo on the computer screen, your excitement drops to a point way below zero. The foreground is unfocused and there is no way, that you can save it.

I still get into that situation from time, in fact it happened to me yesterday. And it really was sloppiness, that was the cause. I didn’t pay enough attention to the little voice in my head, saying “The f-stop is probably not right”. I should have listened to it!

This is my sharp stone:

Sharp-stone.jpg

 100% crop.

And this is my unfocused stone:

Unsharp-stone.jpg

100% crop.

Let’s break it down into one step at a time, and analyze what I did wrong.

I was down on the beach. The sun was setting and the water was very calm, almost smooth. I decided to put on my 10 stop filter to make it perfectly smooth.

I had to focus, before putting the 10-stop filter on, because I knew everything would turn black, when I put it on, and focusing would become impossible.

I composed my photo and started to focus. I almost always focus manually, it took some training to learn to get sharp photos. The technique that I use, is that I start by focusing on the background, and then I dial the focus ring, until I can see the background starts to get blurry. I do this several times, before I am sure that I get the put, just before the background gets blurry.

This point, will give me a sharp background, and as much sharpness to the foreground as possible. What I have really done, is to focus, at something between the camera and infinity, and It’s called the hyper focal point. It is the closest point to the camera, that you can focus, and still get a sharp background.

Hyperfocal-explained.jpg

The hyper focal point

I shot a test shot, looked at it at 100% and it was tack sharp.

When I attached my 10 stop filter on the lens, I did one more thing. When doing long exposures, you can get light leaking through the view finder. The D800 has a shutter for the viewfinder, and I closed this. I have ruined many photos, before learning that it was a light leak through the view finder.

I then took a couple of test shots more, to adjust the camera, to get a well exposed long exposure.

I started out at f/22 without the 10-stop filter, and I ended up at f/5.0 with the filter attached. That gave me a 30 second exposure, the longest I could get, without a cable release, and with a perfect histogram. And I shot my shot.

What did I do wrong? The first test shots were tack sharp, but not my final shot.

The mistake I made, was changing from f/22 to f/5.0, without considering the consequences. What happened was, that the hyper focal point moved 9 ft! What I in reality had done, when I focused, was to focus at a hyper focal point 3 feet away, at f/22. This gave me sharpness from 1,4 ft to infinity.

The closest point of sharpness, moved from 1.4 feet to 6 ft. The nearest rock was at a distance of 3-4 feet from the camera. In other words, it was no longer in the focused distance, and that ruined my photo.

What caught me off guard? I very often shoot very wide, and the hyper focal distance get’s closer, the wider you get. Had I shot at 14mm, the hyper focal distance at f/5.0 would have been 4.3 ft, but at 24mm it was 13 ft. Quite a change and the mistake I made, was I didn’t consider how much this change in the focal length meant. Next time I will think about the hyper focal point, when I shoot at 24mm.

Here’s a table of hyper focal distances. I have marked the change I did when I adjusted the camera:

Hyperfocal table

Had I done the same adjustment at 14mm, the change wouldn’t have been as grave, because I would have worked at much smaller distances.

What I should have done, was:

  1. Kept in mind, what my nearest point of in-focus was, at given f-stop and focal length, with respect to the scene I was photographing.
  2. In this case I should have kept the f-stop at f/22.
  3. Increased the ISO, to maybe 400 or 800, in order to keep the shutter time down.
  4. Used the cable release to allow longer than 30 seconds exposures. I did that anyway for the next shot I made.
  5. Maybe not used a 10 stop filter, but only a 2-stop filter. But, hey, the bigger the better, right?

So, the immediate conclusion is, that the longer focal length, the more you have to be aware of the f-stop.

Landscape photographers, using a camera with a cropped sensor, actually have an advantage here, because a typical extreme wide-angle lens would be something like 10-20mm corresponding 15-30mm on a full frame sensor (if this is nonsense to you, you might want to read about cropped sensors in this article).

Further readings

You might want to read this post on Lens Diffraction too, because at f/22 you also get problems with sharpness. This I learned after writing this article.

4 thoughts on “How to get sharp photos using the hyperfocal point

  1. Hej Jacob.

    Stor ros til alle dine billeder og ikke mindst din blog.

    Ang. ovenstående kom jeg til at tænke på din f-stop. Med et 35mm full frame, får du ikke et voldsomt problem med diffraction ved blænde 22. Har en præsentation liggende et sted (fra en fyr der bestemt ved hvad han taler om) jeg mener der specificerer at ved f22 får man ca 4 Mp ud af objektivet pga. diffraction.

    /Henrik

    1. Hi Henrik

      I have taken the liberty to translate your question into english (using Google Translate :-)):

      High praise for all your photos and especially your blog.

      Regarding above, I came to think of your f-stop. With a 35mm full frame, you will not have a huge problem with diffraction at the aperture 22 If a presentation is somewhere (from a guy who certainly knows what he’s talking about) I mean that specifies that at f22 you get about 4 Mp of lens due to diffraction.

      Thanks a lot Henrik. You question made me do some research. My first instinct was, that it seemed wrong, only to be able to get 4 megapixels at f/22. I have made a new post, in which I show examples and explain what I have learned. There is something about sharpness, but you can get high resolution sharp photos at f/22, but maybe not in all cases.
      You can read the blog post here: http://caughtinpixels.com/how-does-lens-diffraction-come-in-to-the-picture/.

      Have a great weekend 🙂

      –Jacob

  2. Thank you. I found your article very interesting and insightful. It helped to take some of the mystery out of hyperfocal distance for me.

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *