In reply to Eric.
You’re most welcome Eric đ
–Jacob
]]>Thank you. I found your article very interesting and insightful. It helped to take some of the mystery out of hyperfocal distance for me.
]]>In reply to Henrik Gaarn Christensen.
Hi Henrik
I have taken the liberty to translate your question into english (using Google Translate :-)):
High praise for all your photos and especially your blog.
Regarding above, I came to think of your f-stop. With a 35mm full frame, you will not have a huge problem with diffraction at the aperture 22 If a presentation is somewhere (from a guy who certainly knows what he’s talking about) I mean that specifies that at f22 you get about 4 Mp of lens due to diffraction.
Thanks a lot Henrik. You question made me do some research. My first instinct was, that it seemed wrong, only to be able to get 4 megapixels at f/22. I have made a new post, in which I show examples and explain what I have learned. There is something about sharpness, but you can get high resolution sharp photos at f/22, but maybe not in all cases.
You can read the blog post here: https://caughtinpixels.com/how-does-lens-diffraction-come-in-to-the-picture/.
Have a great weekend đ
–Jacob
]]>Hej Jacob.
Stor ros til alle dine billeder og ikke mindst din blog.
Ang. ovenstÄende kom jeg til at tÊnke pÄ din f-stop. Med et 35mm full frame, fÄr du ikke et voldsomt problem med diffraction ved blÊnde 22. Har en prÊsentation liggende et sted (fra en fyr der bestemt ved hvad han taler om) jeg mener der specificerer at ved f22 fÄr man ca 4 Mp ud af objektivet pga. diffraction.
/Henrik
]]>